

In that sense, the newest modification was relate the theory of central coherence to that of connectivity. Simon Baron-Cohen, who specializes in the study of autism, updated the vision of this concept, adapting it to the new research carried out. Other visionsīut that is not the only revision that the theory of central coherence has undergone. The third change of perspective has to do with the difficulties in social interactions that subjects who suffer from ASD usually experience, and is that the first vision of the weak central coherence theory put this as the cause of said problems in the interaction with peers, while what the new perspective does is present this behavior as one more feature of cognition within people with autism. On the other hand, the new revision of the central coherence theory, in this case weak, affirms that people with autism are not incapable of carrying out a global processing of reality, but that have a cognitive bias that makes them have a predisposition to use local processing more frequently and therefore tend to focus on very specific details and not on sets of stimuli. That is, the vision would change the deficit that was believed to exist in the general processing, replacing it with a superiority in the processes of local elements, so the perspective of the original question would be changing. The first of the hypotheses refers to a supposed superiority that would be occurring in local processing (those of concrete details) as opposed to central processing. We are going to review each of them to find out what these proposed changes consist of.

This review resulted in three important changes, which are reflected in three new hypotheses in this regard. However, subsequent studies by the psychologist Francesca Happé and Uta Frith herself, in 2006, changed the original vision of the concept of weak central coherence theory, exposed 15 years earlier. You may be interested: "The 10 main psychological theories".A person who did not suffer from this pathology, unless he has a highly developed capacity, would have to have counted the chopsticks one by one to know the exact amount there were. In this example we can clearly see an example of the theory of weak central coherence, which instead of grouping the stimuli into sets allows the person suffering from it to focus on very specific details, such as the number of toothpicks on the ground. It automatically knows that there are two hundred and forty-six, which added to the four that have not fallen, complete the two hundred and fifty that were originally there.
#Coherence theory movie
Let's remember the famous scene from the movie Rain Man, in which the character played by Dustin Hoffman, a man with a type of autism, sees how the waitress of the restaurant where he is drops a box of chopsticks, all scattering on the floor. This has the drawbacks that we have already seen, but in return it can generate a surprising effect, and it is an unthinkable ability in other individuals to process specific details. This phenomenon often makes people with autism tend to focus their attention on very specific details of reality and not on the whole of the elements that make it up. That is, part of the characteristics of autism spectrum disorders could be explained because these people would not have the capacity (or it would be more reduced) to automatically associate the perceived stimuli to adapt them to common patterns. According to Frith, our brain always looks for a line of coherence in all the stimuli it receives from the environment through all the senses, to be able to integrate and group them quickly. To talk about the theory of central coherence we must go back to the year 1989, which was when the psychologist Uta Frith, from University College London, coined this concept.
